Wi-Fi HaLow 40KM Long-Range Field Test Report | Anjielo

Wi-Fi HaLow 40KM Long-Range Field Test Report | Anjielo

Wi-Fi HaLow 40KM Long-Range Field Test Report | Anjielo

Wi-Fi HaLow 40KM Long-Range Field Test Report

📅 Release Date: September 7, 2026 📍 Test Location: Majiawu Observation Deck (200m) & Wangwei Mountain (700m), Hangzhou 🏷️ Keywords: Wi-Fi HaLow, 40KM Range Test, Sub-1GHz, UAV Video, Smart Agriculture

1. Test Background

As IoT (Internet of Things) and LPWAN (Low-Power Wide-Area Network) applications continue to expand, there is a growing market demand for long-range, medium-to-low data rate, and low-power wireless communication solutions. Wi-Fi HaLow (IEEE 802.11ah), operating in the Sub-1GHz band, offers distinct advantages including superior penetration capability, extended coverage, and native IP protocol stack compatibility.

To verify the extreme-range communication performance of our self-developed Wi-Fi HaLow modules under real-world geographic conditions, we conducted a 40-kilometer line-of-sight (LOS) range test in December 2025 between Majiawu and Wangwei Mountain in Hangzhou. The test focused on evaluating packet throughput stability and environmental interference resilience across modules with different transmit power levels.


2. Test Environment & Equipment

Test Sites (Straight-line distance: approximately 40 km)

Location Elevation Environmental Characteristics
Majiawu Observation Deck 200m Suburban area, high RF noise floor, multiple interference sources
Wangwei Mountain 700m Open highland, relatively clean electromagnetic environment

Modules Tested (Model & Quantity)

  • FZ7020-27 (Tx Power 27dBm) — 3 units
  • FZ7020-30 (Tx Power 30dBm) — 2 units
  • FZ7020-33 (Tx Power 33dBm) — 2 units
  • FZ7030-35 (Tx Power 35dBm) — 2 units

(Devices were deployed at both sites to establish point-to-point and multi-node concurrent test links.)

Wi-Fi HaLow 40KM range test equipment deployment diagram

3. Test Methodology

  1. Fixed-end equipment was placed at Wangwei Mountain (higher elevation), while mobile-end equipment was placed at Majiawu (lower elevation). The path between the two sites had no significant obstructions, satisfying line-of-sight conditions.
  2. All modules operated at maximum transmit power, performing continuous packet injection with fixed packet size and fixed intervals for over 30 minutes per session.
  3. Recorded metrics included PHY rate, actual application-layer throughput, and packet loss rate, with performance comparisons made between the two environmental conditions.
Wi-Fi HaLow 40KM range test methodology diagram

4. Key Test Conclusions

4.1 All Communication Links Established Successfully

Under 40km line-of-sight conditions, all tested modules (27dBm to 35dBm) successfully established stable connections with zero disconnections or re-association failures, fully demonstrating Wi-Fi HaLow's exceptional coverage capability in open scenarios.

4.2 Throughput Performance Positively Correlated with Transmit Power

  • Higher-power modules (FZ7030-35, FZ7020-33) consistently achieved higher MCS rates in favorable environments.
  • Lower-power modules (FZ7020-27) still maintained usable throughput at the same distance, sufficient for typical IoT applications such as sensor data backhaul and image transmission.

4.3 Environmental Noise Floor Impact — System Robustness Confirmed

The Majiawu site, being in a suburban area, exhibited a significantly higher RF noise floor compared to Wangwei Mountain, resulting in an overall throughput drop of approximately one MCS level (e.g., from MCS 4 to MCS 3). Despite this unfavorable condition, all modules maintained zero or extremely low packet loss, demonstrating excellent interference resistance and link adaptation capabilities.


5. Data Summary (Highlights)

Test Metric Best Environment (Wangwei Mt.) Noisier Environment (Majiawu) Remarks
Max Stable Throughput Higher (≥XX Mbps) Moderate (~1 MCS level lower) Rate auto-adjusted due to noise floor
Link Setup Success Rate 100% 100% No notable difference
Packet Loss Rate (30 min) <0.1% <0.5% Well below typical application tolerance

Note: Specific MCS index and corresponding throughput values can be provided in detailed appendices upon request.

Wi-Fi HaLow 40KM range test data summary chart

6. MCS Rate Reference Table (Wi-Fi HaLow 802.11ah)

The table below shows theoretical PHY rates (in Mbps) for different Modulation and Coding Schemes (MCS) under single spatial stream operation. Actual throughput will be slightly lower due to protocol overhead and environmental factors.

MCS Index Modulation Coding Rate 1MHz 2MHz 4MHz 8MHz
0 BPSK 1/2 0.30 0.65 1.35 2.93
1 QPSK 1/2 0.60 1.30 2.70 5.85
2 QPSK 3/4 0.90 1.95 4.05 8.78
3 16-QAM 1/2 1.20 2.60 5.40 11.70
4 16-QAM 3/4 1.80 3.90 8.10 17.55
5 64-QAM 2/3 2.40 5.20 10.80 23.40
6 64-QAM 3/4 2.70 5.85 12.15 26.30
7 64-QAM 5/6 3.00 6.50 13.50 29.30
8 256-QAM 3/4 3.60 7.80 16.20 35.10
9 256-QAM 5/6 8.67 18.00 39.00
Wi-Fi HaLow 802.11ah MCS Rate Reference Curve (1/2/4/8MHz Channels) Wi-Fi HaLow MCS Rate Reference Curve Single Spatial Stream · Theoretical PHY Rate (Mbps) 1MHz 2MHz 4MHz 8MHz Rate (Mbps) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 MCS Index 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Regresar al blog

Deja un comentario